SearchPublisher and Institutes
You are here: Home :: Area NEM :: Medical science :: Human medicine :: Nuclear medicine
M. Schmidt, W. Eschner, M. Dietlein, P. Theissen, H. Schicha
Established nuclear medicine techniques for tumour diagnosis (tumour SPECT): Can they still compete with 18F-FDG-PET?
This overview presents the indications of tumour SPECT in contrast to tumour PET using 18F-FDG. A number of diagnostic SPECT radiopharmaceuticals have been used for years in oncology and are widely available in nuclear medicine departments. Today, tumour SPECT has to compete with tumour PET using 18F-FDG. Other PET radiopharmaceuticals are common only in specialised centers. In comparison to SPECT, PET images with their higher resolution are technically superior. Therefore, PET is better than SPECT in localising a tumour, if the special tumour entity accumulates 18F-FDG. Thus, 18F-FDG-PET has largely replaced SPECT examinations using 201Tl chloride, 67Ga citrate or 99mTc anti-CEA. It is questionable whether mammascintigraphy using 99mTc-MIBI or 99mTctetrofosmine will be broadly accepted in clinical routine. SPECT radiopharmaceuticals are still up to date for examination of tumour entities which do not accumulate 18F-FDG (e. g. neuroendocrine tumours) and in clinical problem solving if 18F-FDG-PET is not regarded as superior (e. g. search for recurrent medullary thyroid carcinoma) or in the management of tumours with overlapping diagnosis and therapy as it is the case for differentiated thyroid carcinomas (123I/131I-NaI), phaeochromozytomas, and neuroblastomas (123I/131I-MIBG), carcinoids, gastroenteropancreatic tumours, paragangliomas, and Merkel-cell tumours (somatostatin receptor scintigraphy). Future developments concerning new SPECT radiopharmaceuticals and image fusion such as SPECT/CT are expected.
Nuklearmedizin, Schattauer
Print ISSN: 0029-5566
Volume: 44, 01/2005
Pages: 37 - 48