Microsatellite typing is frequently used in disease diagnosis
and in genetic association studies. Inter-study
consistency and comparability is essential in both applications.
In this study, we show that the interlaboratory
comparison of microsatellite sizes is often discrepant
and misleading. This is a matter of great concern in the
recent literature. However, accurate allele designation
is easily attainable by the simple procedures we report,
which are applicable to all gel-based genotyping methods.
These involve: 1) the creation of dedicated standards
for a specific microsatellite by PCR-amplifying
representative alleles to generate an allelic ladder with
comparable electrophoretic characteristics; 2) including
both internal and external standards during electrophoresis
to facilitate alignment. In addition, we recommend
procedures that will improve inter-study
comparability of all microsatellite analyses regardless
of genotyping method. These involve: 1) cloning and sequencing
representative microsatellite alleles to obtain
accurate size designation; 2) sharing alleles of known
sequence between laboratories to use as standards. We
report on the typing of natural resistance-associated
macrophage protein (
Print ISSN: 1434-6621
Volume: 40, 09/2002
Pages: 926 - 929