SearchPublisher and Institutes
You are here: Home :: Area NEM :: Medical science :: Human medicine :: Nuclear medicine
J. Bucerius, C. Herkel, A. Y. Joe, C. Altehoefer, J. Finke, E. Moser, M. J. Reinhardt
18F-FDG PET and conventional imaging for assessment of Hodgkins disease and non Hodgkins lymphoma. An analysis of 193 patient studies
Keywords: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging
The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic value of FDG-PET and conventional imaging (CI) in a large series of patient with Hodgkins disease (HD) or non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) at three time points during their course of disease. Patients, methods: 169 consecutive lymphoma patients (69 HD; 100 NHL) were included. 193 FDG-PET studies were performed for staging at baseline in 42 cases, for post-therapeutic monitoring in 103, and for diagnosis of recurrence in 48 cases. Performance indices of sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of metabolic FDG-PET and morphological CI were calculated. Differences in staging and diagnosis of residual or recurrent lymphoma were compared. Results: FDG-PET changed staging in 36% of cases for staging at baseline, in 52% of cases for monitoring response to treatment, and in 29% for diagnosis of recurrence. FDG-PET staging results were confirmed in 80% for staging at baseline, in 74% for monitoring response to treatment, and in 50% for diagnosis of recurrence. FDGPET and CI differed significantly at monitoring response to treatment for sensitivity (0.91 versus 0.69; p < 0.02), specificity (0.90 versus 0.38; p < 0.00001), PPV (0.77 versus 0.42; p < 0.001), and accuracy (0.83 versus 0.55; p < 0.02). Conclusion: FDG-PET should be considered as the diagnostic modality of choice for post-therapeutic assessment of lymphoma patients and may be a reliable alternative to CI for staging at baseline and diagnosis of recurrence.
Nuklearmedizin, Schattauer
Print ISSN: 0029-5566
Volume: 45, 01/2006
Pages: 105 - 110