Stefan Th. Gries, Beate Hampe, Doris Schönefeld
Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions
Much recent work in Cognitive Linguistics and neighbouring disciplines has
adopted a so-called usage-based perspective in which generalizations are based
on the analysis of authentic usage data provided by computerized corpora.
However, the analysis of such data does not always utilize methodological
findings from other disciplines to avoid analytical pitfalls and, at the same
time, generate robust results. A case in point is the strategy of using corpus
frequencies. In this paper, we take up a recently much debated issue from
construction grammar concerning the association between verbs and
argument-structure constructions, and investigate a construction, the English
as-predicative, in order
to test the predictive power of different kinds of frequency data against that
of a recent, more refined corpus-based approach, the so-called collexeme
analysis. To that end, the results of the application of these corpus-based
approaches to an analysis of the as
predicative are compared
with the results of a sentence-completion experiment. Concerning the topic under
consideration, collexeme analysis is not only shown to be superior on a variety
of theoretical and methodological grounds, it also significantly outperforms
frequency as a predictor of subjects’ production preferences. We conclude by
pointing out some implications for usage-based approaches.
Cognitive Linguistics, Walter de Gruyter
Print ISSN: 0936-5907
Volume: 16, 12/2005
Pages: 635 - 676
Show full article (external site)
Show all available items of this journal