Science.Online
Publisher and Institutes
Akademie Verlag
Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik
Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag
Walter de Gruyter
Schattauer
You are here: Home :: Area CULI :: Linguistics and literature :: Communication science
 
Albert Atkin, John E Richardson

Arguing about Muslims: (Un)Reasonable argumentation in letters to the editor

Keywords: argumentation, pragma-dialectics, reasonableness, broadsheet newspapers, Muslims

This article analyses letters to the editor written on or about Muslims printed in a British broadsheet newspaper. The pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation is applied as a model for explaining and understanding the arguments employed in the sampled letters. Our presentation of pragma-dialectical theory focuses on argumentative reasonableness. More specifically, we introduce the four dialectical stages through which any argument must pass and explain the ten rules of critical discussion that participants must follow throughout if they are to resolve the argument. The article focuses in particular on the letter writers' use of argument schemes—that is, the manner in which these writers use arguments to support their standpoints. We conclude by highlighting the role that unreasonable arguments can play in perpetuating racialized inequalities and hence the importance of analyzing argumentation.

Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, Walter de Gruyter

Print ISSN: 0165-4888
Volume: 27, 01/2007
Pages: 1 - 25

Show full article (external site)

Show all available items of this journal